For all the wailing and gnashing of teeth that has gone on in the last week, we've got damn little to show for it. That little fiasco did, however, make a number of things clearer than most would like to admit, but they're not necessarily the ones we like to think.
You may not want to admit it, but Emma Goldman was right: If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal.
Great Britain said they wanted out of the EU. There's not even the slightest hint that the process is even being seriously considered. The Tories apparently have to get their house in order. Why? What as it in before? It wasn't this vote that split it. The pranks and psychoses that were there before are now simply going to involve other people. None of this has anything to do with sovereignty or immigrants or lack of democracy on the Continent. The Brits have just as much democracy as anyone else: none. We're simply back to business as usual.
Believe me, I'm not picking on the Brits. They merely brought a couple of issues to the surface. As I noted recently, the US can't even pretend to have a democracy in any meaningful sense of the word. Though that doesn't stop them or their pundits from piping up. Both Juncker and Merkel this week have shown they have absolutely no intention of getting democratic about anything. Even people who think they did things right get to do them over again if the right people insist on it. Nothing to see here: it's just business as usual.
Hell, the only people I can see trying to make a point at all are the French, and we can't won't hear a thing about it because the European Cup (the European Soccer Cup for my American readers, and believe me, it's a big sports deal, in all senses of the word) is being played and the media isn't about to ruin such a fine sporting event. After all, there are advertisers to consider on the one hand, and ... well, you know, that is even more business as usual.
It's not really my place, but I have to tell you: democracy has nothing to do with voting or elections. Nothing. They like to tell us that the term "democracy" comes from the Greek and means "rule of the people", but you should know that ever since the term has been coined, the demos was considered a "mob" and there is no self-respecting elite in the world who is going to put up with mob rule.
Personally, and I'm as about as far away from an elite as you can get, I see their point, and I also see how well they can turn us into a mob when it suits them. Just look at the Brexit fiasco. Don't get me wrong, it's the not the end result I'm calling into question, it is the process of getting there that stunk to high heaven. We really need to think twice about getting into bed with racists and bigots (with a wink here to my American friends supporting Trump) if you don't want to be lumped in with racists and bigots. Voting, though, referendums, elections ... all those nice respectable outlets we're allowed to have ... they're just games were allowed to play to get us to think we have something to say. We don't. If we did, why are the French out in the streets? They have every reason to be: their government doesn't listen to them any more than yours listens to you. They have also experienced -- up real and personal -- just how much difference an election makes.
My question is: just when are we going to get it? just when are we going to realize that all of this "working within the system" is just a rather underhanded way of keeping all of us under their thumb?
Oh, I know what a lot of you are thinking ... especially the more paranoid and those of you who consider yourself smarter and more critical than the average mob person: he's seeing conspiracies, this one; maybe we ought to get him a tinfoil hat. That's OK. You are allowed to think whatever you want regardless of how silly it is. I'm not saying that there is some organized cabal planning the oppression of the rest of us, some nefarious and shadowy group plotting our enslavement. Here is what I do know, however:
- There is not a Western government that isn't dominated by special interests.
- There is not a Western politician who isn't influenced -- for or against -- by those interests.
- There are large corporations who are willing to spend a pittance on lobbying knowing full well their return-on-lobbying-investment will be worth every penny.
- There are very, very rich people who aren't going to share a penny with anyone else if they can help it.
- Those powerful corporations driven by profit and those rich folks have much more in common with each other than the rest of us think we have with each other, even if it is only their love of money.
- Neither of these groups is what we might call "democratically inclined".
But that's "the system", as we all know it. But, you should know that I know this as well:
- The last thing they want is for US to think we might be able to do anything about it.
And they succeed, not in some grandiose, concerted, focused effort at suppression, but because it is simply too easy to get us quibbling amongst ourselves, to get us angry at each other, and to have us at each others' throats. It's so easy because they have convinced most of us that we're nothing more than individual egos seeking our own self-interest, and that we're really nothing more than losers if we think otherwise.
I'm sorry, folks, but it is really not any more complicated than that.
If change is going to come ... that is, change that in any way, shape and form is, or may be beneficial for ourselves or our children or our grandchildren ... we've got to wake up and not smell the coffee, but smell the stench of deceit, distrust and defeat that they shower upon us.
There are times when the bravest thing you can do is to just say "no". Now is one of those times.
If you don't like the world as you find it, if you don't like the world as it's being shoved down your throat, if you don't like the world that others have made for you, then it's your move. No political candidate is going to "work for you"; they're going to work for whoever pays them enough to get re-elected. No elected official is concerned about you; they are concerned about their constituencies and getting re-elected. Am I saying that there are no elected officials or politicians who are trying to make a difference? Not at all. What I am saying is that "system" is broken, so let's stop trying to fix it, but instead try setting up something new that works. What does that "something new" look like, how does it work? I have no idea, but it doesn't matter. Since when do you need me telling you what is good for you?
If you don't like the world as you find it, stop whining (or whinging, as my British friends might say) about lost opportunities and wasted votes. Get informed, get smart, get active. Most of all, start talking: to family, friends, neighbors ... figure out what is important to you and find like-minded people to help you achieve your common goals. Think big and start small, but start. And when in doubt, ignore the system. It wasn't set up for your benefit, that's for sure.
There is no one that can make a difference in the world other than yourself. Like it or not, it all starts with you. It's time you realized that and did something about it.
5 comments:
Good to find your thoughts here. I concur completely and more.
I know you don't have the master plan, but what more concrete ideas do you have? Say no to the system...and yes to what? What's important to you to create?
For me, it's important to create a "community". This can be done actually and virtually, I believe. Getting together with friends and neighbors is absolutely essential if one is going to develop a shared understanding of what's important and what is not.
These physical groups can, and should be, augmented by virtual groups: online communities in which broader scale issues can be addressed, again with the intent of developing shared understandings and priorities.
The overarching notion, I suppose, is one of more direct democracy. If one is politically active, this can be done in current political structures, even, as the recent Chicken Coup in the British Labor Party has shown.
David Graeber (of Debt: the first 5,000 years fame) has some good ideas on how to get started, and his recent Guardian article addresses the political party aspect as well.
Marco: a link to the quintessence of Graeber's remarks: http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/the_real_reason_labour_elites_and_journalists_hate_jeremy_corbyn_20160705
Thank you, Ed. I don't know any more viable option than to start with the people one knows. Neighbors. Virtual neighbors. Start talking and organizing, self-educating, imagining possibilities and acting on them. I have read a little of Graeber's writing on anarchy and read or listened to an interview or two. I'm familiar with his thesis that money doesn't originate as a replacement for barter, but as a way of tracking debt.
I'm reminded of that picture of the earth from space with words on it to the effect: "Total world debt: 13 Trillion Dollars. Who exactly are we in debt to?"
From the simple transparency of the absurdity we've created, a whole new civilization could be built.
I'm thinking must be built ...
Post a Comment